Re: [-empyre-] agreements

[jon.satrom <jon@selectall.org>]

Hello empyre,

I have been lurking on the list for a bit now and think this is a 
wonderful platform for discourse. As a coreDeveloper of criticalartware 
I have opened + plan on monitoring the discourse port in my critical 
brainware.

jonCates wrote:
> the UA needs revising. i personally think the first should revision 
> should be a find-and-replace  of the word 'user' w/'participant'. the 
> spelling error in the quote jh choose is also a first order fix.
Thank you jC for highlighting this. I was formulating a re:sponse this 
AM which had the same amendment. I also think that we should note that 
in a lot of places the term criticalartware includes the coreDevelopers 
and all contributingDevelopers encompassing the entire criticalartware 
community (all users).

jC wrote:
> criticalartware does not represent itself as a [group/project] as 
> 'open source'. we are committed to offering shared resources to a 
> growing community of participants. as artists + as a project, 
> criticalartware is interested in open source as a concept
The "open source-ness" of criticalartware is w/in the [community+info 
offered]. The [history+present] we are collecting is "open source" // 
meaning that anyone can become a node and contribute their own 
knowledge.base ++ experiences.

> jh wrote:
> > isn't a UA  just simply an application of one of the tired forms of 
> > top-down relation
Yes! One thing that we are exploring is the 
[blur/slippage/exploitation] of tired structural systems when artists 
[break/remix] them.

I am excited for the opportunity to host this forum.
Thank you Christina,
Thank you in advance Empyre,

jon.satrom
[*=*]
http://selectall.org
http://www.criticalartware.net